What recourse options are available if a complaint is deemed accurate but not severe enough for more than 30 days of suspension?

The correct choice reflects the potential disciplinary actions that can be taken when a complaint is validated but does not warrant a lengthy suspension of more than 30 days. In such cases, the governing body responsible for optometry practice can implement various alternative sanctions aimed at addressing the violation while allowing the practitioner to continue their professional activities under certain conditions.

Censure may serve as a formal reprimand, indicating that the practitioner's conduct was inappropriate but not severe enough to warrant a suspension. Probation allows the practitioner to continue practicing while being monitored for compliance with specific terms set forth by the board, ensuring ongoing professional accountability. A civil penalty could entail a financial fine as a punitive measure. A non-disciplinary order might require the practitioner to agree to certain terms without classifying it as a disciplinary action. Finally, a letter of concern serves as a documented caution regarding professional behavior that should be improved.

These options are designed to provide a measured response to less severe infractions, focusing on correction and education rather than solely punitive measures. Other choices do not encompass the range of actions appropriate for addressing moderate issues within the framework of professional conduct.