What is required for a board member's service limitation?

The correct answer indicates that a board member's service is limited by a restriction on full terms served. This is a common practice in many boards to ensure that fresh perspectives and new ideas are continually brought into the organization. Limiting the number of full terms that an individual can serve helps to prevent stagnation and fosters diversity in leadership roles. This approach also encourages engagement from other qualified individuals who may want to contribute but might be deterred by the long-term tenure of some members.

In the context of board governance, service limitations support a healthy turnover, which can lead to better decision-making and governance overall. This prevents any single person from holding too much influence or power for an extended period, which benefits the entire board's function and integrity.

The other options, while they may touch on important aspects of governance, do not accurately reflect the established practice regarding the limitation of board service. For instance, limiting committee involvement or the number of complaints reviewed does not directly relate to the overarching policies governing a member's tenure on the board. Similarly, a cap on the number of complaints filed focuses more on operational procedures rather than the structural limitations on board service itself.