The board is not required to file a report with the Senate or House if there has been no proposed increased scope of practice in the last how many years?

The requirement for the board to file a report with the Senate or House hinges on whether there has been a proposed increase in the scope of practice for a period of five years. This specific timeframe is significant as it determines the frequency of legislative review and oversight regarding optometry practices.

When no proposals for increased scope of practice have occurred within this five-year window, the board is not mandated to produce a report. This provision serves to streamline legislative processes and ensure that resources are not devoted to unnecessary reports if there has been a prolonged period of stability in the scope of practice.

Understanding this context is crucial for those studying Arizona's optometry laws as it underscores the legislative framework governing practice expansions and the importance placed on regular reporting when changes are proposed. Subsequent years without proposals do not trigger the same reporting obligations, hence the specific five-year requirement.