If a licensee is aggrieved by the final decision of the board, what are they entitled to?

When a licensee is aggrieved by the final decision of the board, they are entitled to a judicial review. This process allows the licensee to seek recourse through the court system, where they can challenge the board’s decision regarding their license. Judicial review is a critical aspect of administrative law that provides an avenue for individuals to contest decisions made by regulatory bodies that they believe were made in error or were unjust.

Judicial review ensures that the actions taken by the board comply with statutory and regulatory requirements. It provides a legal framework for reviewing whether due process was followed, whether the board acted within its authority, and whether the decision was supported by substantial evidence.

In contrast, options such as additional training, reinstatement of a license, or a refund of the application fee do not inherently provide a formal means of contesting the board's decision. These do not address the legal pathway available for challenging or requesting a reconsideration of administrative decisions. Therefore, judicial review is the most appropriate and recognized method for a licensee who feels wronged by the board's final decision.